Global warming is a social, a cultural, a spiritual, a mental, and a psychological problem. But as a topic for social research it remains largely untouched. As for now, it remains a topic left with the experts of the physical and natural sciences to map out, wrap up, and resolve. As these scientific reports we are getting are becoming more and more worrisome, and it may seem as if solving the problem of global warming — making global warming stop — is going to take a lot of social change. Unless we are all supposed to come to believe there will be new technological fixes to the problems of emissions from oil, gas, and coal on a relatively short notice, it means the consumption of oil, gas, and coal must be brought down from the current level, and not be allowed to increase as expected by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Now, as there is virtually no social indicator available to say otherwise, it seems as if the IEA will be right in assuming that CO2 emissions will increase in the coming years, and not decrease, as would be required (the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has issued statements to the effect that we have an eight-year window of opportunity at our hands here). I say: this should in every possible way leave the social sciences with a task that should not be overlooked. But the masters of the social sciences keep overlooking it. Why? Because the probable end results of the proposed social scientific investigation into the matter of the social changes required to prevent the heating of the world to dangerous levels are way too depressing to even try to cope with. And I say this because it is everywhere for everyone to see that there is not much that is being done to curb greenhouse gas emissions. — Not here, not there, and not anywhere. While we all ought to know that we got to get started here, we keep procrastinating.
This is a social dilemma which is not being studied by anyone (I just googled the line “global warming social challenge” and didn’t find much of interest, I’m afraid). But I’d like to believe the ugly truth must someday come out of the social sciences departments and institutions of the university sector. As it is: I’m still waiting for signs of warning coming from other fields of study than the psychological science (some research on the actual human side of the global warming situation is actually being studied by psychologists). I am thinking first and foremost of the departments of philosophy, sociology, and social anthropology, and I ask myself: why are these people keeping their mouths shut? Can’t they see that global warming is also a social phenomenon? And that it needs to be adressed?
Whenever media outlets are broadcasting the publications of new physical science reports that says things about the emissions cuts that needs to be undertaken, I am not among those who instinctively start thinking about possible technological fixes. I’m left thinking about the social aspects involved in reducing fossil fuels use. As for now, I’m quite ready to accept the notion that I’m thinking like a madman, and that most people believe technological solutions to global warming is right around the corner. But I doubt that there is. The solution to global warming is a global-wide social revolution, that’s my belief. But it’s also my belief that this is not going to happen. We’re going to sit around waiting for technological fixes until our faces turn blue. As the class system and the nation-state system continues to pose as among the most important sources of grievances amongst our number, and also as the most important sources of social distractions available to us, as a relatively high CO2 emissions output remains an indicator of wealth, happiness, and joy all over the planet. While relatively low individual and societal CO2 emissions levels are the safest of all statistical signs of poverty.
Global warming is a hypocrisy issue. As bad news is the fastest kind of news available to the human brain, I know that global warming is something that all sincere adults are aware of, and worried about, no matter where on the planet they are living. I’d also like to believe that most adults are indeed sincere. A fact which leads me to believing that the current world civilization must collapse as soon as possible, and be replaced by a much more nature friendly civilization: one that puts a greater value on what’s best for Mother Nature than it does on the interest of the nation-state, the corporate economy, the great wealth of the very few, and so on. I don’t believe it is going to happen.
So I’m off to meet with my space alien friends again. The little green people who are all baffled by what they’re seeing on this planet. Watching this species of four-wheeled mammals about to going absolutely insane by way of coming to understand and realize what a social mess we are all wading into here. As a whole species of ecosystems destroyers are coming to realize that we should be living a bit more like red indians here, or stop driving cars until the new and eco-friendly batteries have gone safe. And rage aginst the soothing tele-vision machines while we’re at it. As we understand that they are making our present times appear so very beautiful and cosy while the whole planet is seething with fantastic climate chaos and exhilarating extreme weather events, just waiting for us to connect with a future that is looking dimmer and dimmer as procrastination is left to just continue. And so on.
Now, my space aliens belong to my Dream-Lands. Where they’ll stay. Always with me, but never part of me.
Distantly introspect.
March 22, 2008 at 4:50 pm |
Nice Site layout for your blog. I am looking forward to reading more from you.
Tom Humes
March 22, 2008 at 6:59 pm |
You know, I was just thinking about the same thing. I was writing my report on climate change for a scientific contest and I was surprised to find nothing about it in the books that I have on the subject. Someone needs to pick this up, now!
Kristjan Velbri.
March 23, 2008 at 12:26 pm |
Kristjan,
It’s almost as if the masters of the social sciences have already concluded that there really can be no social climate change action taking place. Now, I’m thinking of actual reduction of fossil fuel consumption here, and I realize, fully well, that it is a non-starter.
I’m thinking: Why is it that the masters of the natural sciences are so much more courageous than the social scientists? I mean: the natural scientific papers that are being released these days are all worrisome to the degree that you’d believe some university departments of sociology around the world would want to take a look at the issue.
As for now global warming is an problem that only a few psychologists are treating as an issue for the psychological departments to try and deal with, while the vast majority of sociologists treat it as a non-issue.
March 24, 2008 at 11:08 am |
The latest news about climate change is so alarming (the right wing would say alarmist) as to make many people want to plant their aching heads in the sand. Some scientists using advanced computer models now argue that if we want to stop the Earth from warming, the amount of carbon we should be emitting is … none. None? As in, zero? As in, shutting down the global industrial economy? After all, global energy demand is expected to accelerate until at least 2020. Yet attempts even to slow the rate of increase of carbon emissions have paralyzed world politics for more than a decade.
March 24, 2008 at 12:43 pm |
Alan,
The global CO2 emissions must come down. And everything you’re saying here is true to the point. So long as people just don’t want to think about the consequences of doing nothing good on the part of the environment at large (the world’s atmosphere, for Bob’s sake!), chances are, we’re going to keep at it the way we always have been. — And the ghost of Sitting Bull will be thinking: What A Laugh. — And my space alien friends will certainly be thinking the same thing.
I’m thinking: we’re dealing with a relatively new term here: “manmade climate change.” And at the same time, the population keeps exploding. And I’m thinking: us being in some kind of trouble here is only natural, in a sense. But we’ve got to come to terms with the problems first. And then decide not to just continue looking the other way no more, but start tacking the CO2 issue like sincere adults should. Probably by means of re-writing history while we’re at it, I think, as what we’re up against ought to be an important paradigm shift, I suppose. — Unless, of course, we should decide to spend the next century or so going madder and madder, until there really can be no saying what we should be doing no more.
March 24, 2008 at 7:20 pm |
“Unless we are all supposed to come to believe there will be new technological fixes to the problems of emissions from oil, gas, and coal on a relatively short notice…”
Actually, there ARE technological fixes already available; we’re just not using them. I’m associated with a company called Recycled Energy Development (recycled-energy.com), which reduces greenhouse pollution and power costs at the same time. One way is through “waste heat recovery,” a process that takes the heat from manufacturers’ smokestacks and turns it back into electricity. Another is through “combined heat & power,” by which small plants are placed on site at large institutions rather than having power being delivered inefficiently, over many miles, by utilities. The reason these solutions aren’t exploding is that regulations favor the utilities. That’s the real thing we have to change.
March 24, 2008 at 9:36 pm |
I sometimes wish I was in possession of a degree in energy technology. That way I’d be better equipped for discussing the technological ins-and-outs with some authority. As a social scientist (at best), I’m glad to inform everyone out there that solar energy exists. There should have been big solar plants in North Africa and the Middle East by now. But there isn’t. I think it’s got something to do with the politics of oil, the politics of money, the politics of status quo, and the politics of making business stay as usual for as long as damned well possible.
March 25, 2008 at 8:01 pm |
It started snowing here (in Estonia) last Friday. We didn’t have any snow for months, although we usually do, and I have a reason to believe this is all down to GW. Now the thing is that if you start toying with snow, which ultimately means toying with lighting, because that’s what snow does – it reflects light. Over the last few days I’ve noticed that people are very grumpy and I think it’s all down to the weather. It’s massive. People are grumpy and tired all the time, but usually there is quite a small amount of them. This is one the first signs of the psychological strain that GW puts on people. I’m tired too, but I’m trying hard not too be grumpy. Do you have any experience with these kind of events?
March 26, 2008 at 5:45 pm |
Heh! Yeah.
— Kristjan, I’m down with global warming: after years of attaining specialist knowledge on the topic it has developed into some kind of a mental and psycho-social condition. I think I can equally confess to you that I am down with Mount Zion, too. I keep saying to myself: “I need peace, I need peace.” And that’s a symptom.
About other people: yes, I have seen a lot of strange behaviour over the past few years. I believe very strongly that humans in general are easily embarrassed by the fact that we all belong to a species of mammals, and that, as such, we are creatures of nature too. We’re not only creatures of society and culture, and now that nature seems to turn against us (as was said in an episode of Desperate Housewives) of course we are going to experience psychological strains and spiritual problems. I also believe in instincts.
It’s very difficult to say much about human instincts, dreams, and mental properties. I just know that these are problems of the human psyche that are of interest to every single author of fiction of this world, so of course there are proofs and truths to be found in the details.
- —
As for strange weather in Estonia: let me tell you that the seasonal patters and weather events here in Norway over the past few years have been “wild.” With roses blooming in West Norway in December and spring plants turning up in North Norway in January. The summer of 2006 was extremely warm, while last summer was closer to normal. However: this winter is strange: hardly no snow at all, and extremely mild. February was the warmest ever since they started to measure weather. And what looked like spring in the beginning of March has all of a sudden turned into winter again. It seems as if we just have to prepare for the unusual, as what we’ve got on this planet is “climate chaos.”
March 29, 2008 at 7:14 pm |
I guess it’s pretty much the same in Estonia and Norway. We are on the same climate region after all.
March 29, 2008 at 7:56 pm |
Yes. While the heat is potentially damning to central and southern European farmers, the northern regions are poised to benefit from global warming; but only in the short term. Long term we’re probably looking at a future full of big problems as concerns the steady food production in our part of the world. The same goes for many other food producing regions in other parts of the planet. But we’d better not talk too much about that, now should we? I mean: looking twenty or fifty years into the future is too scary.